satan's Secret Agents.


Let’s begin by considering the corrosive work of the Frankfurt School: 
a group of German-American scholars,
mostly Jewish, who developed highly provocative and original
perspectives on contemporary society and
culture, drawing on Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, and
Weber.

Their idea of a “cultural revolution” was not
particularly new. Joseph, Comte de Maistre
(1753-1821), who for fifteen years had been a
Freemason, had this to say: 

“Until now, nations were
killed by conquest, that is by invasion. 

But here an
important question arises: can a nation not die on its
own soil, without resettlement or invasion, 
by
allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the
very core those original and constituent principles
which make it what it is?”

What was the Frankfurt School?

Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution
in Russia, it was believed that a Workers’ Revolution
would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the
United States. 

It failed to do so. Towards the end of
1922, the Communist International (Comintern) began
to consider the reasons for this failure.

On Lenin’s initiative, a meeting was organized at the
Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. The aim of the
meeting was to throw light on the meaning of Marx’s
Cultural Revolution. What did “cultural revolution”
entail? What was it all about?

First amongst those present, was Georg Lukács, a
Jewish Hungarian aristocrat and son of a banker. He
had become a Communist during World War I. 

A good Marxist theoretician, he had developed the idea of
“Revolution and Eros” —
sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction.

Then there was Willi Münzenberg, another revolutionary Jew whose
proposed solution to the problems besetting society was 
“to organize the intellectuals and use them to
make Western civilization stink. 

Only then, after they
have corrupted all its values and made life impossible,
can we impose the
dictatorship of the proletariat.”

“It was”, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007), the
conservative author and co-founder of the National Review, 

“a meeting more harmful to Western
civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.”

Lenin died in 1924, but by that time Stalin had risen to
power and was beginning to look on Willi Munzenberg, George Lukács 
and other Jewish revolutionaries (like Trotsky) as dangerous Marxist
“revisionists”, introducing concepts into Marxism that
were alien to Marxism and which served only a
Jewish agenda.

In June 1940, on Stalin’s orders, Münzenberg was
hunted down to the south of France by a NKVD
assassination squad and hanged from a tree.
In the summer of 1924, after being attacked for his
writings by the Fifth Comintern Congress, Lukács
moved to Germany. Here he chaired the first meeting
of a group of Communist oriented sociologists. This
gathering was to lead to the foundation of the
Frankfurt School.

This “School”, designed to put flesh on their
revolutionary program, was started at the University
of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung. To
begin with, school and institute were
17 Satan's Secret Agents
Based on an original article by Timothy Matthews.

Abbreviated and adapted with additional material by Lasha Darkmoon.indistinguishable. 

In 1923, the Institute had been
officially established, and funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975). 

Weil, born in Argentina into a wealthy
Jewish family, was sent to attend school in Germany at the age of nine. 

He attended the universities in
Tübingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a
doctoral degree in political science. While at these
universities he became increasingly interested in
socialism and Marxism.

Carl Grünberg, the Institute’s Jewish director from
1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist, although the
Institute did not have any official party affiliations.
But in 1930 Max Horkheimer (also Jewish) assumed
control. He believed that Marx’s theory should be the
basis of the Institute’s research.

When Hitler came to power, the Institute was closed
and its members, by various routes, fled to the United
States and ended up as academics at major US
universities: Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and
California at Berkeley.

Then there was Willi Münzenberg, another
revolutionary Jew whose proposed solution to the
problems besetting society was “to organize the
intellectuals and use them to make Western
civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted
all its values and made life impossible, can we impose
the dictatorship of the proletariat.”

“It was”, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007), the
conservative author and co-founder of the National
Review, “a meeting more harmful to Western
civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.”

Lenin died in 1924, but by that time Stalin had risen to
power and was beginning to look on Willi
Munzenberg, George Lukács and other Jewish
revolutionaries (like Trotsky) as dangerous Marxist
“revisionists”, introducing concepts into Marxism that
were alien to Marxism and which served only a
Jewish agenda.

In June 1940, on Stalin’s orders, Münzenberg was
hunted down to the south of France by a NKVD
assassination squad and hanged from a tree.
In the summer of 1924, after being attacked for his
writings by the Fifth Comintern Congress, Lukács
moved to Germany. Here he chaired the first meeting
of a group of Communist oriented sociologists. This
gathering was to lead to the foundation of the
Frankfurt School.

This “School”, designed to put flesh on their
revolutionary program, was started at the University
of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung. To
begin with, school and institute were
indistinguishable. In 1923, the Institute had been
officially established, and funded by Felix Weil
(1898-1975). 

Weil, born in Argentina into a wealthy
Jewish family, was sent to attend school in Germany
at the age of nine. He attended the universities in
Tübingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a
doctoral degree in political science. While at these
universities he became increasingly interested in
socialism and Marxism.

Carl Grünberg, the Institute’s Jewish director from
1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist, although the
Institute did not have any official party affiliations.
But in 1930 Max Horkheimer (also Jewish) assumed
control. He believed that Marx’s theory should be the
basis of the Institute’s research.

When Hitler came to power, the Institute was closed
and its members, by various routes, fled to the United
States and ended up as academics at major US
universities: Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and
California at Berkeley.

LD: The fact that they spoke very poor English was no
disqualification. They were Jewish, and so they managed to
obtain prestigious academic appointments through Jewish
influence, i.e., through networking a system that works —
exceptionally well even today and which accounts for the huge
and unfair preponderance of Jews in academia.

The School included among its members the 1960s
guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse — denounced
by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which
“opens the way for [sexual] licence cloaked as liberty”
— Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular
writer Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen
Habermas. All these individuals except Habermas
were of Jewish origin.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long
as an individual had the belief — or even the hope of
belief — that his divine gift of reason could solve the
problems facing society, then that society would never
reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they
considered necessary to provoke a socialist revolution.
Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to
undermine the “Judaeo-Christian legacy.”

LD: “ ” Judeo-Christian is an oxymoron, a contradiction in
18terms, given that Judaism and Christianity are at opposite ends
of the religious spectrum. Since most Jews are actively hostile
to Christianity, and since Talmudic Jews actually take pleasure
in the thought of Christ being boiled in excrement in hell, to
speak of the Judeo-Christian legacy is clearly nonsensical. “ ”

To undermine Western civilization, the Frankfurt
School Jews called for the most negative and
destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life.
To de-stabilize society and bring it to its knees, to
engineer collapse, to produce crisis and catastrophe —
this became the aim of these maladjusted and mentally
sick Jewish revolutionaries masquerading as
high-powered intellectuals.

Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus
— “continuing the work of the Western Marxists by
other means”, as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their “quiet” cultural revolution, 
the Frankfurt School made the
following twelve recommendations — all of them
calculated to undermine the foundations of society and create
the dystopia we now see all
around us:

1. The creation of racism
offences and hate speech laws.

2. Continual change to create
confusion (e,g., in school
curricula).

3. Masturbation propaganda in
schools, combined with the
homosexualization of children
and their corruption by exposing
them to child porn in the
classroom.

4. The systematic undermining of parental and
teachers’ authority.

5. Huge immigration to destroy national identity and
foment future race wars.

6. The systematic promotion of excessive drinking
and recreational drugs.

7. The systematic promotion of sexual deviance in
society.

8. An unreliable legal system with bias against the
victims of crime.

9. Dependency on state benefits.

10. Control and dumbing down of media. (Six Jewish
companies now control 96 percent of the world’s
media. LD).

11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.

12. All all-out attack on Christianity and the emptying
of churches.

LD: In the Soviet Union, under Stalin and his Communist
Jews, the emptying of churches was accomplished by the
simple expedient of burning the churches down thousands of —
them and building synagogues instead. — See The Communist
Nations Since 1917, chapter 3, by Anna M. Cienciala
(http://web.ku.edu/~eceurope/)..

Coincidentally, most of these same aims and
objectives were set out prominently in the pages of that
alleged “forgery”, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. 

The Jewish
philosophers of the Frankfurt School, it seems, had been
heavily influenced by the Protocols. 

They were clearly
impressed by what they read there
and decided to implement its
recommendations in their own
sinister agenda.

One of the main ideas of the
Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of “pansexualism”:

the search for indiscriminate sexual pleasure, the promotion of
“unisex”, the blurring of
distinctions between the sexes,
the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women, 
and, finally,
the undermining of heterosexuality at the expense of
homosexuality — as, for example, in the idea of
“same-sex marriage” and the adoption of children by
homosexual couples.

Willi Münzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s
long-term operation thus: “We will make the West so
corrupt that it stinks.”

“We must organise the intellectuals and use them TO
MAKE WESTERN CIVILIZATION STINK! Only
then, after they have CORRUPTED ALL ITS
19
Willi Münzenberg 1889-1940VALUES AND MADE LIFE IMPOSSIBLE, can we
impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.” (Emphasis
added)

LD: According to Sean McMeekin s The Red Millionaire: A ’
political biography of Willi Munzenberg, M nzenberg was the ü “
perpetrator of some of the most colossal lies of the modern
age . 

He helped unleash a plague of moral blindness upon …
the world from which we have still not recovered.”

The Frankfurt School believed there were two types of revolution: 
(a) Political revolution and 
(b) Cultural revolution. 

They were more concerned with cultural
revolution, the demolition of the established order
from within. “Modern forms of subjection are marked
by mildness”, they taught. So-called “reforms” were
to be made so slowly and subtly that these changes for
the worse were barely perceptible. 

The School saw the
undermining of the social order as a long-term project.

LD: The systematic erosion of Christian moral values and the promotion of sexual perversion is
known as cultural Marxism.

Today, thanks to the efforts of organized Jewry which controls 96 percent of theworld s media, cultural Marxism has ’largely triumphed and Christianity lies in
ruins. 

To many dispassionate observers, society has now reached its rock bottom moral nadir as —Jewish Marxists such as Willi Munzenberg (see quote above) would have been only too happy to witness— had he been around today.

These iconoclasts kept their sights firmly fixed on the family,education, media, sex andpopular culture. Each of these would be their target. If things did not go from bad to worse,year after year, they were not succeeding. To these revolutionary Jewish thinkers, bad was good — and worse was better.

The Destruction of the Family and the Promotion of Feminism The School’s Critical Theory preached that the “authoritarian personality” was a product of the patriarchal familyan idea 
directly linked to Engels’Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State, which promoted matriarchy.

Already Karl Marx had written, in the Communist Manifesto (1848), about the radical notion of a
“community of women”. 

In The German Ideology (1845), he had written disparagingly about the idea of the family as the basic unit of society. 

This was one of the basic tenets of the Critical Theory: 
the need to break down the family unit.

LD: All families were essentially evil, these thinkers believed — — even happy families so they had to be destroyed. It was better if children had no parents, or did not know who their parents were. 

Or if they were orphans of the state.

It was better if romantic love between the sexes, leading to stable long-term marriages, were destroyed in favor of short-term, unstable, promiscuous relationships. 

After all, the former might lead to happiness for all concerned, and that was clearly impermissible for the whole point of the Cultural —Revolution was to create a culture of “pessimism (Luk ” acs) and to make life “impossible for everyone. (M ” unzenberg).

The Institute scholars therefore preached that “Even a partial breakdown of parental authority in the family might tend to increase the readiness of a coming generation to
accept social change.”

LD: These neo-Freudian Marxist
philosophers of the Frankfurt School were
clearly out to create trouble: to drive a
wedge between parent and child and sow
division in the family. Whatever was good in
human relationships simply had to be
destroyed. If people didn t have problems, ’
then problems would have to be
manufactured to make life impossible. “ ”
(Munzenberg).

All this prepared the way for the
warfare against the masculine gender
promoted by Marcuse under the guise of “Women’s
liberation” and by the New Left movement in the
1960s. 
They proposed transforming our culture into a
female-dominated one.

LD: The idea that women should run society and wear the
trousers, telling men what to do, had an enormous appeal to
certain bossy types of women with a surplus of testosterone,
20
Georg Lukács (1885–1971):
“I want a culture of pessimism …
a world abandoned by God”particularly to butch lesbians and man-hating matriarchs. 

Many
of these misguided females were to become evangelists for
radical Feminism, some even proposing to cut themselves off
from the male sex completely and live in communes of their
own. 

Curiously enough, the number of Jewish feminists is huge
—out of all proportion to their percentage in the population.
In 1933, Wilhelm Reich, an honored and adulated
member of the Frankfurt School, wrote in The Mass
Psychology of Fascism that matriarchy was the only
genuine family type of “natural society.” 

He was, as
such, to be an inspiration to the feminists.
LD: Reich, incidentally, a compulsive
masturbator and sexual pervert, had
entertained incestuous longings for his
own mother and practiced bestiality
with horses while still a child. (See
Masters of Porn: The Systematic
Promotion of Sexual Deviance by Dr.
Lasha Darkmoon at
theoccidentalobserver.net).

This versatile sexual deviant,
now a cult figure on the left,
along with the equally
sex-obsessed Herbert Marcuse
—popularizer of the slogan
MAKE LOVE, NOT WAR—
were to be godfathers of the
Sexual Revolution of the 1960s
as well as the patron saints of
the Feminist movement.

The Indoctrination of Children through Education Bertrand Russell was to join the Frankfurt School in their efforts at mass social engineering. 
He spilled the beans in his 1951 book, 

The Impact of Science on Society.

He wrote:

The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children 
on whom they
will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black.

Various results will soon be arrived at. 

First, that the influence of home is obstructive.

Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten.

Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective.

Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity.

But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.

When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.LD:

The irony is unmistakable, but that is beside the point. Russell was all for turning the world upside down and ushering in Brave New World: atheism, feminism, and sexual liberation “ ”i.e., the green light to promiscuity, perversion, and abortion on demand.

The devaluation of values so sought after by the luminaries of the Frankfurt School has now largely been achieved through sex education and media propaganda: 

in particular, by the promotion of masturbation, pornography, 

and the systematic high pressure salesmanship of homosexualityin schools.

LD: This, then, is the secret agenda of organized Jewry as represented by 
the Cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School: 

the destruction of traditional values, the destruction of the moral order, the destruction of the family unit, the destruction of religion, the destruction of meaning and purpose, and, finally, the destruction of happiness itself.

These are the people who now rule over us. 

They are in control. 

They create new wars with the same rapidity that a stage magician pulls rabbits from a hat. 

And they make sure that the people they rule over, their subject populations, are either demoralized debt slaves in insecure jobs or unemployed bums living on state benefits and a diet of junk food and sleazy junk entertainment 
laid on by the Jews.
Satan’s Secret Agents have been only too successful 
in creating a New World Order that bears a remarkable resemblance to hell.

Sources and References.

Satan's Secret Agents
Based on an original article by Timothy Matthews.
Abbreviated and adapted with additional material by Lasha Darkmoon.
The original article by Timothy Matthews is found at
snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.co.uk This modification by Lasha
Darkmoon is taken from thetruthseeker.co.uk