Monday, October 20, 2014

Rape and Plunder in German Cities After World War II

British, Bolshevik and American War Crimes During World War II


video

New Edition Released 09/02/2014

A Must Read For Those Who Love The Truth!




(Book Review) Hellstorm: the Death of Nazi Germany (My Vote = Book of The Year)


hellstrom


The victor always writes history. 

Only Germans were 

prosecuted at Nuremberg. 

British and American 

war crimes were whitewashed 

out of history. 

If not for Kurt Vonnegut’s 

best selling 1969 novel 

Slaughterhouse Five, Americans 

would have no knowledge of the 

deliberate targeting of civilians 

in the firebombing of Dresden.


Hellstrom: the Death of Nazi Germany 1944-47 is a meticulously researched encyclopedia of Allied war crimes during World War II. 

In it, historian Thomas Goodrich carefully compiles statements of scores of 


eyewitnesses, including Allied pilots and war correspondence about US, British and 



Russian atrocities against German civilians and POWs during and after the war.


video

A Deliberate Campaign of Terror Bombing


Dresden wasn’t the only German city subjected to carpet firebombing 

aimed at terrorizing civilians. 

Based mainly on victim and pilot statements, Goodrich details the deliberate 


firebombing (with phosphorus-based incendiary bombs) that occurred in 



Hamburg, Berlin, Nuremberg, cologne, Daimstat, Pforzheen and Wurzburg. 



The allies also firebombed three Swiss cities, another war crime, as Switzerland was a “neutral” country with no identifiable military targets.

Goodrich mainly focuses on Dresden, one of the last German cities to be firebombed.

Many residents believed it would be spared, owing to its cultural treasures and role as a hospital city for injured civilians.

Dresden had no defense installation, major factories or air defenses.

Owing to the absence of anti-aircraft weapons, the Allied bombers could fly low enough to target fleeing civilians and hospitals designated with a large red cross on their roof.

The Red Cross later estimated that the Dresden massacre killed 300,000 – 400,000 civilians.

Prior to Dresden, the American pilots, unlike the British Royal Air Force (RAF) 

deliberately refrained from targeting. 

At Dresden, this changed, with Americans planes deliberately targeting civilians 

who survived the initial firestorm.

Eisenhower Deliberately Circumvents 

Geneva Convention


Like Bush II, Eisenhower deliberated created a new category of prisoners

called Disarmed Enemy Forces (DEF), so he wouldn’t be bound by the

Geneva Convention regarding treatment of Prisoners of War (POWs).

His treatment of POWs worsened following the May 8, 1945 armistice with Germany, as he no longer feared German retaliation against American POWs

In all, 800,000 German POWS died in French and US POW camps after the war ended the armistice. 

This contrasts with German treatment of Allied POWs, which followed the Geneva Convention 99% of the time.

The book contains victim statements from German POWS held in outdoor pens where they were drenched by continuous rain and fed 1/10 of a K ration three or four days a week. 


Eisenhower denied the Red Cross access to POW camps, as well as 

prohibiting them from supplying German prisoners food. 

The British, US and French military also used German POWs as slave labor, 

despite formal Red Cross protests that this, too, 

violated the Geneva Convention.

Forcible Repatriation of Soviet Dissidents

In addition to the mistreatment of POWs, the Allies honored a commitment

they made at Yalta to repatriate one million Soviet dissidents (including 

White Russians who fought the Bolsheviks in 1917) to the USSR. 

This included 4,000 Soviet dissidents in the US 

who were forcibly repatriated. 

Stalin, in turn, summarily executed them or sent them 

to slave labor camps.

The Brutal Allied Occupation


The treatment of German civilians and POWs by invading forces varied. 

On both the eastern and western fronts, experienced front line troops tended to 

be the most civilized. 

They reasoned that good treatment would make the Germans in the next 

village more likely to surrender. 

The rear guard tended to be far less experienced and 

more inclined to engage in 

rape, gang rape, looting and torture. 

Stalin refused to sign the Geneva Convention, and Russian troops were 

particularly feared for their savagery.

During the occupation, Eisenhower and Truman deliberately engineered a famine in the Allied sectors (US, British and French) of Germany.

The massive carpet bombing had totally destroyed the food infrastructure and millions of German civilians starved as they tried to survive on boiled grass and roots.

Truman outlawed private food relief to Germany until the pope, former president Herbert Hoover and numerous high profile senators and journalists objected to the Truman’s policy of deliberately starving the German civilian population.

In all, far more Germans died in the first two years of peace than had died in six years of war.

The Allies also carried out a particularly brutal regime of “de-Nazification” in which German adults (including prominent anti-Nazis) were arbitrarily arrested and tortured until they confessed to being members of the Nazi Party.

The treatment of German civilians would improve in 1947, as the Cold War gained momentum and Truman recognized Germany’s importance as a bulwark against the Soviet Union.

Dresden9
photo credit: Dresden bombing

Slaughter of German Cities After 

World War II


video


Historian Keith Lowe declares at the beginning of his 

2007 book Inferno: 

The Fiery Destruction of Hamburg that “I am aware that 

this book might have made uncomfortable reading for some.”[1]

Why? Did Lowe fear that Inferno would upset the 

Holocaust establishment? 

Who are those people who would feel uncomfortable reading the book?


If Lowe is presenting facts, why would some people be uncomfortable with 

them in the first place? 

And what is it that Lowe is actually saying in the book 

that would make people so upset?

We all know that serious historical scholarship can be an uncomfortable 

territory, particularly for those who do not 

have enough guts to tell the truth 

and follow it wherever it leads. 

In fact, historical truth and artifacts can bring 

emotional pain and wounds. 

As intellectual historian Mark Lilla rightly put it,

“Whoever takes it upon himself to write an honest intellectual history of 

twentieth-century Europe will need a strong stomach. 

But he will need something more. He will need to overcome his disgust long

 enough to ponder the roots of this strange and puzzling phenomenon.”

Lowe seems to have a strong stomach when it comes to examining the 

destruction of German cities, 

but he does not seem to possess the intellectual courage

 “to ponder the roots of this strange and puzzling phenomenon.”

Furthermore, Lowe lacks the moral courage to tell us quite frankly who the 

culprits really are. And we shall see why in a moment. Lowe writes,

“There is still a great deal of bitterness toward Germany,

despite the decades that have passed, and many people simply do not care if the Germans suffered or not.

“During the course of my research, I have spoken to scores of people

—Jews, Gypsies, Poles, Danes, Dutchmen, Frenchmen, the list goes

on—who have listened to my descriptions of the Hamburg firestorm and merely shrugged their shoulders.

‘It was their own fault,’ is the standard reply. ‘They started it.’

“I would be surprised if even the most intransigent of these people could remain unmoved by some of the eyewitness accounts of the firestorm and its horrific effects.

“In Germany it remains virtually impossible to mention the bombs without the immediate acknowledgement that it was they who opened Pandora’s box in the first place.”

orderlyandhumane
Lowe, like noted historian R. M. Douglass and Hans 

Erich Nossack, indicates that popular historians 

have been doing a terrible job documenting what 

happened to German cities after 
World War II. 

Lowe declares,

“I have been consistently surprised by the 

general ignorance of these facts among my 

own countrymen.

“In his course of the two years of 

writing [Inferno] 

He had come across very few people outside the

 world of military historians 

who knew that 

Hamburg 

was ever bombed at all, let alone the sheer scale of 

the destruction that took place.

“Hamburg is a byword for horror, and yet in Britain 

few people know it even happened.

In North America, too, there is widespread 

ignorance of the basic facts, 

although to some extent 

America’s geographical and emotional distance from Hamburg 
excuses this. (not really) 

We have allowed the viper marxist jews in the shadows to completely revise our traditions, and the history of our people we should learn in our public school textbooks and also what our media & movies portray.

We The People by allowing these criminals to gain monopolies as dual citizens is a serious lack of interest, care or awareness on our part and our leadership (now usurped by these vampires) committing every evil they can abroad and at home in our name. 

This inexcusable slothful American behavior has enabled the parasite not only keep us ignorant but each generation which follows.

Every Video Game in America should be destroyed and outlawed then we should all cut the cords off of our TV's and throw the cell phones in the trash. Life was better before they existed.

“Even those who have heard of the Hamburg firestorm are generally unaware of its ghastly human consequences.”

Lowe’s frustration is understandable. 


I also have been flabbergasted by some of the most ridiculous statements ever uttered by one of my historian friends with respect to Nazi Germany. 

Especially when I think about remarks from a professor or school teacher who remains ignorant of the very subject they claim to be an expert in.


After a long conversation, during which I challenged some of his sources, he then turned around and questioned archival documents, saying things like,

“How do I know that I should trust them? How do you know they are not fabrications?”

I specifically bought him a copy of R. M. Douglass’ 

Orderly and Humane: 


The Expulsion of the Germans after the Second World War. 



I told him to read it and we generally agreed to discuss it.


After a few weeks, he came back with his conclusions. I simply could not believe what I was hearing from him. 


His main objection was that he could not trust Douglass’ citations and conclusions because they are hard to verify, since most of them are from historical archives.


Now here is a man who frequently cited secondary sources, but all of a sudden he cannot trust archival documents! Why?

Obviously the documents did not line up with his preconceived notion. Yet he did not know that he was making my job easy. I agreed with his thesis only to destroy it later. I responded,

Germany after the War
Germany after the War

“Well, well, well. 

That begs the question, doesn't it? 

If you want to go to great length to challenge archival documents, which are some of the finest historical artifacts we have, shouldn’t you do the same thing with secondary sources?

“Don’t you laboriously cite secondary sources to me as your authority? 

Don’t you repeatedly say that Hitler wanted to exterminate all the Jews in Europe, 

a historically preposterous and mathematically implausible idea?

“Are you seriously saying that secondary sources are 

more reliable than 

archival and primary documents? 

Is that an intellectually sound position?”

He slowly got a little quiet. He is a military man who served in the Gulf War and knows much more about warfare than one who has not served.

He got shot at twice and at one point he almost got killed by a hand grenade.



We have been friends for more than two years and he has shown to be a gentleman. Yet his ideological worldview does not allow him to see the obvious.


What I have learned last year and what I am still trying to understand is that some beliefs are so dear to some people that they are willing to die for them—even if those beliefs could be demonstrably shown to be false.

I simply am appalled when I read some of the stuff that is out there and some of the statements that people try to put out in order to make a point. 


I sometimes simply have to ignore them precisely because many of those statements are simply silly and sophomoric.


And then you've got other people who believe that when you refute an argument or declare that an argument is silly or sophomoric or preposterous or irrational, you somehow are attacking the person who posited the argument in the first place!
That really was news to me precisely because I thought this was a non-issue among serious academics and scholars.
It is really discouraging when people who ought to know better would even remotely suggest that by attacking an argument, you somehow dislike the person positing the argument.


For example, after arguing against one of Plato’s arguments, eminent philosopher Julia Annas of the University of Arizona declares that


“This gives Plato a very silly argument, and we should try to do better if possible.”

Was she personally attacking Plato? Did Annas somehow have some animosity toward the ancient Greek thinker? 


Did she really despise him as a human being?


Or did Annas have to make a list of things that she likes about Plato so that readers would know that she really does not have some animosity toward him?


When mathematician John Allen Paulos for example talks about “an intentionally silly argument” and compares the trinity to an “obviously silly” statement or that the argument for miracle is “beyond silly,” was he personally attacking the people who produced the argument? 



Can we seriously deduce that Paulos somehow hates those people just on that premise alone?


Moreover, have people even read popularizers such as Richard Dawkins, who make it very clear that some arguments are really silly?

When David Hume declared that “Lowe never asserted so absurd a Proposition as that anything might arise without a cause, was he personally attacking those who maintain this view?

What is even more disheartening is that if you evidentially point out that some statements are demonstrably false, the same people who produce those statements continue to uphold and defend them as if facts and evidence simply do not matter!

Sometimes it is just disappointing to know that some of those people graduated from many of the top universities in the country, where they should have been trained in logic, rigorous, solid argumentation, Problem Solving and Critical Thinking Skills to discern lie's and deception from truth and reality.


Richard J. Evans
Richard J. Evans
Going back to Lowe, he is far from alone. Richard J. Evans of Cambridge, in reviewing Douglass’ 

Orderly and Humane, noted quite rightly,

“At the end of World War II, between 

twelve and fourteen million people, ethnic Germans, 



were forcibly expelled from Eastern Europe, or, if they had already fled,



were prevented from going back to their homes.

“Others were detained in appalling conditions in concentration camps for weeks, suffering from disease, starvation, and maltreatment, before they were brutally pushed out to the west.

“Long lines trudged towards Germany, with the weak succumbing to hypothermia and malnutrition. 


Altogether probably half a million and perhaps as many as a million perished in what was the largest action of what later came to be known 



as ‘ethnic cleansing’ in history. (Since multicultural babylon captivity (White Genocide) has Always been The Goal of The Jew). 



The jew knows the white race is the only thing between them and A New World Order.

“This massive act of expulsion and forced migration is still largely unknown outside the countries most closely affected by it. 


The story appears in standard histories of Germany and Europe in the twentieth century as little more than a footnote.”

So far, so good.

But the question that Evans should ask himself is simply this: whose fault is that?

Is Evans really telling us that he is not an accomplice in all this? Didn't he defend Jewish thought police Deborah Lipstadt in court?

And didn’t Evans get thousands of dollars in return? 

Didn't he get to write books for major New York publishing houses while those same publishers did not want to reprint David Irving’s books because Irving said some uncomfortable but true things about what he called “the traditional enemy of the truth”?
Jews most holy book Claims Jesus is in Hell & Mary was a Whore!
These identity thieves are not semitic nor did they play any part in The Christian Bible except to be completely eliminated forever at Messiah's 2nd Coming. 

Does Evans mean to tell us that he doesn't know that Lipstadt calls just about anyone she does not like an anti-Semite?

Doesn’t Evans know that Lipstadt even called Jimmy Carter—of all people!—a soft-core denier for writing Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid?

Doesn’t Evans know that Lipstadt tried to get people fired from their academic positions just because they expose lies as perpetuated by hoaxers like Elie Wiesel?

Here’s what Lipstadt said about the noted German historian Ernst Nolte:

“Historians such as the German Ernst Nolte are, in some ways, even more dangerous than the deniers.

“Nolte is an anti-Semite of the first order, who attempts to rehabilitate Hitler by saying that he was no worse than Stalin; but he is careful not to deny the Holocaust but I will it was really a Holohoax. The Red Cross and UN has said the same. Just more jew lie's to gain sympathy and steal wealth from dupped Judeo-Christians.

The Holodor in Russia by the bolshevik jews was the real holocaust.
Both are simple to research and prove. This is why jews have to lobby for hate speech laws so no one ruins their racket by waking the masses to their evil deeds.

Norman Davies
Norman Davies

“Holocaust-deniers make Nolte’s life more comfortable. 

They have, with their radical argumentation, pulled the center a little more to their side.

“Consequently, a less radical extremist, such as Nolte, finds himself closer to the middle ground, which makes him more dangerous.”

Lipstadt is simply a double-minded person. For example, in 2011, she declared that

“If anti-Semitism becomes the reason through 


which your Jewish view of the world is 



refracted, if it becomes your prism, then it is 



very unhealthy. Jewish tradition never wanted that.”

She even added that

“The ‘hysteria’ and ‘neuroses’ of many Jews and 

Israelis (Not Israelites



who compare the current situation in Europe and in the Middle East to the Holocaust era. ‘People go nuts here, they go nuts.

“There’s no nuance, there’s no middle ground, it’s taking any shade of grey and stomping on it. 


There are no voices of calm, there are no voices of reason, not in this country, not in Israeli.’”

 Yet when the Israeli regime was getting a huge backlash for slaughtering 


innocent civilians in Gaza just a few months ago, Lipstadt took the center 



stage and declared in the New York Times that Anti-Semitism “was rooted 



in longstanding Christian views that demonized the Jews.” 



WOW! What Hypocrites! There is No Truth in Them!


They Are So Insane They Demonize and Try To Genocide The White Race But In Reality It's 180* Inverse the other way but for some reason they believe their own lie's with tears to sudden outburst of loud threats to any question of proof because they never have proof just more outlandish lie's on top of more BS they teach our children in school.

Our Aryan Race (the youngest on earth) has moved starting in Asia abt. 5500 BC @ The Tarin Basin moving west to escape constant jew persecution until we could go no further and look there are as many jews in the US who followed us here about 6 million same as the terrorist state of israeli.

Truman didn't like them but they gave him Two Million Cash in 1948 to recognize them. He Caved! Just as Woodrow Wilson whom they Blackmailed with His Affair with a Professor's Wife while President of Princeton University.

Knowing the jew I sure it was a set up how else does it so happen they were the only ones on Earth who ever knew of the affair. With this blackmail they got the first jew appointed to the supreme court. Justice Louis Brandeis (University of Louisville (his hometown) Law School is Named in his honor).

Additionally The IRS Act and Federal Reserve Act were signed into Law December 23rd (same day the CAFR comes out each year. The secret 2nd set of financials for The USA Inc. $56 Trillion of hidden taxpayer invested funds in the black not to be known) 1913 by a handful of loyal zionist puppets.


Lot's of blood on his hands for a briefcase full of paper they printed for a few cents per handful.



Even When Their Most Holy Book The Talmud & rabbi's teach Jesus is in Hell Boiling in His Own Increment and they say on live TV They wish They Could Kill Him Again and They Teach Mary Was A Whore!



She then concluded:

“The telegram has arrived. 


Jews are worrying. (I hope it keeps awake at night or day).



(now push twice as hard and twice as un-politically correct).



It is time for those who value a free, democratic, open, 



multicultural and enlightened society to do so, too. 



This is not another Holocaust, but it’s bad enough.”[16]

Going back to Evans, has he already forgotten that he is the author of the new book Altered Past: Counterfactuals in History, in which he takes it as a brute fact that six million Jews died in Nazi Germany.
ANNE FRANK

The Red Cross and The UN's released numbers that agree with Russia and West German numbers and state from disease and from  lack of 

medical supplies toward the end of WWII 
(bombs from the US during the day & UK at night) death toll in all 13 camps from all nationalities was about 300,000 which jews were 67,000 of the 300,000. 

There were only (1939) 240,000 jews total in Germany and Hitler allowed them plenty of time to leave and take all their possessions 

(Jews Would Tattoo Their Swiss Bank Account Numbers on themselves after wisely moving from German Marks to Swiss Francs 

During The War So Not to Lose or Forget if anyone wanted to liquidate those in the camp they could have deprived them of water food shelter

and medical care not housed at their own expense everything they needed for four years how can a reasonable person who researches 20 or 

30 minutes still believe lying jews and holohoax extortion scam

but some stayed and continued to work against German Interest so they had no choice as America had no choice with their 300,000 Japanese. 


The jews and japs in those camps with swimming pools musical 

instruments ect... had the best spot in the war 

The Red Cross even delivered their mail daily.


The Jew declared War then even gets protected from it. The y are masters at playing the victim card to elevate their status receiving special privileges over any other group.


Evans indeed is part of the Holocaust establishment,[18] but somehow he is trying to distance himself from the very circle which, at this present moment, holds the West captive when it comes to probing historical enquiry and research.


In the same vein, Keith Lowe certainly should know that there is a Jewish establishment in the West that seeks to usurp serious historical knowledge.

Lowe, like Evans and others, should know that there is a book out there by a Jewish ideologue entitled Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, in which its author argues that ordinary Germans play a crucial role in bringing about Nazi Germany.

The author of the book, Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, tells us in 

an afterthought that those ordinary Germans were certainly 


“anti-Semites who believed that exterminating Jews was right and necessary.”

If you happen to challenge that premise on a rational and 


historical ground, Goldhagen will try to sue you.[19]

Lowe does not even analyze Goldhagen’s book in his Inferno

Nor does he discuss the ideological forces behind those who try to cover up 

historical events with respect to what happened during and after World War II.

Why?

Well, if Lowe even mentions the names of those people, he probably would not be able to publish books for major New York publishing houses. 


He almost certainly would be sent to academic Siberia. He probably knows what happened to historians and academics such as Norman Davies and Norman Finkelstein.



We all know what happened to Norman Finkelstein. But when Norman Davies challenged the accepted views of both the Holocaust in Nazi-occupied Poland and the Stalinist regime in Soviet Union, he was ultimately denied tenure at Stanford University.

tim cole
“Davies’s works have been criticized at Stanford and elsewhere, by such experts as Lucy S. Dawidowicz 

(author of The War Against the Jews: 1933-1945 even though it was the jews who declared war in 1933) 

who said they felt Davies minimized historic anti-Semitism 

(they are not semitic people they were originally Asiatic like the North American Indians) 

in Poland and tended to blame Polish Jews for their fate in the Holocaust.

“Davies’ supporters contend that Poles suffered 

as much as Jews did in the war and could have done very little to save any of 

the 3 million Jews living in Poland at the time of the Nazi invasion in 1939.

“Davies had sought $3 million in damages from the university for what he called fraud, misrepresentation, breach of contract, discrimination and defamation.”

Davies suddenly realized that the Dreadful Few were a lot more powerful than he ever imagined. He eventually moved to England, where he taught history at the University of London and later became a fellow at Oxford.

Davies is not an obscure historian. His scholarly works include God’s Playground: A History of Poland (in two volumes); Europe: A HistoryNo Simple Victory: World War II in Europe, 1939-1945; and Heart of Europe: 

The Past in Poland’s Present.

Yet in 2005, Davies dropped a historical bomb that implicitly devastated the Holocaust establishment, writing a sharp critique of both the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, which was published by the Sunday Times.

After demolishing many of the arguments as articulated by 

the Holocaust establishment, 

Davies declared,

“On the ideological front, westerners are accustomed to thinking of 

the second world war as a two-sided conflict, of good fighting evil.

“The Soviets had a similar dialectical view. 

They were the authors of the concept of an 

anti-fascist which caught on in the West, encouraging the illusion that all 

opponents of fascism were inspired by similar values.

“In reality, Soviet communism was as hostile to western democracy as it was to fascism. 

Stalinist practices, however, undermine the entire moral framework within which the allied cause was perceived.

“It is not possible to maintain that the allies were fighting for untrammeled good if the largest of their members was habitually given to mass murder.


Judaism is Communism.

FDR, Eisenhower were 

Jews 

Patton was not. 

He had a moral compass 

(Aryan means Noble).

Jews are psychopathic serial killers with no empathy, sympathy or regard for anyone

but themselves and those of their own family and race if it is beneficial to them. 


Those who are profitable to their progeny and they are 


brainwashed 


by their rabbi's that they will be reincarnated as a member of 

the same family 

sometime after their death 

so they will be descendants of themselves in the 

same family sharing from the same pot of wealth. 

Needless to say they have always been driven to make money by 

any means necessary in the movies the mafia is always Italian 

but in reality they are bolshevik turko-mongol jews and 

big supporters of incest because of the lack of trust 

they have no dealings with anyone outside of their family.

No one can be trusted with the family secrets 

which plays a big part of the 43 hereditary diseases 

from generations of incest they are vulnerable to.

They believe everyone else is only cattle only here to serve 

them and when they die they are gone forever unable to regenerate 

themselves but as always with the jew the opposite is true. 


Those of YAHWEH GOD will be resurrected the last day 

@ the 7th Trump Others will not in this age.


In the jews mind they need to eliminate the useless eaters (90% of world population) 

they are just useless eaters depleting their earth of resources.

People call oil a fossil fuel but no fossil has ever been found deeper than 15,000 feet and oil comes from 30,000 plus everyday.

Oil is able regenerate itself under ground in those conditions available there. 

They tell you that there is just a finite supply so you will pay $4.00 a gallon for it.

Not Money but The Love of Money willing to do anything for it causes 

all 

the evil in the world. 

Just as Jesus said jews were responsible for 

every drop of righteous blood spilled 

from Abel To Zechariah (John The Baptists father).

As oil refined into petroleum and is turned back into carbon above 

ground to feed all the plant life CO2 on earth which in return create 

oxygen for us.

Like the rain that flows into the river and then out to sea. 

Clouds form over the oceans in the moonlight.

The clouds absorb salt water then the clouds 

ionize the salt out of the water within the cloud  

so they may pour out fresh (H2O) water 

fertilizing the ground and hydrating man.

When our people sin we are chastised by Yahweh. 

Jews know this but 99% of White Men do not.

(also a corrupt populous is easier to control)

If our sin continues the chastising grows in intensity as labour pains 

until we finally go humbly to our knees and cry out 

to our Father, Repent and ask Father to Forgive and Restore us.

You might say well the black, jew or asians are not chastised like that. 

You are correct. 

They are not His children so he is not concerned 

with their correction as he is ours during this age. 

For some this life is all they may ever have. 

they were created (Genesis 1)

we were formed (Genesis 2.7) and YAHWEH Himself breathed into us 

the breath of life which is His Spirit.

The created races and animals have a physical body and a soul 

but no spirit or our frequency in constant contact with our Father 

YAHWEH who created everything in the heavens and on earth.  

By The Grace of our Father The Great I AM He gave us all three.

We were also in the Heavens with our Father 

when the earth was created.

We then were born of woman (water) from above inheriting & taking 

on this temporary biodegradable clay shale that covers 

our spiritual bodies which are light. 

As Quantum Mechanics states everything begins with light.

1/3rd were not born of woman (being born of water and keeping their spirit from above) did not keep their first estate and they were called 

fallen angels mis - identified (poissing as false aliens) today as aliens but are of pure demonic darkness like their leader lucifer. 

Rev 3:9  Behold, I am causing those of the synagogue of Satan, the ones who call themselves Jews and are not, but are lying—behold, I will make them come and kneel down before your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you. 

Rev 3:10  Because you have kept the word of my patient endurance, I also will keep you from the hour of testing that is about to come upon the whole inhabited world, to put to the test those who live on the earth. 

Rev 3:11  I am coming quickly! Hold fast to what you have, so that no one may take away your crown. 

If your DNA is mutated = a lost crown (not an overcomer). Hybrids cannot inherit the kingdom you Father wants to give you.

Rev 3:12  The one who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God, and he will never go outside again, and I will write on him the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem that comes down from heaven from my God, and my new name. 

Rev 3:13  The one who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.' (GK) Ecclesia = an assembly (church = bad translation).

The first to arrive is the false messiah if you can pinch yourself and it hurts you know this isn't our shepherd you are still in the flesh. 

Think of a Caterpillar Turning into a Butterfly (flesh to spirit). but the adversary wants to build you into a better Caterpillar to serve his needs plus he remains in charge if there are no elect for YAHWEH to come for (if we all volunteer excepting the new transhumanism software data within so called superpowers) Transhumanism a new race (hybrid, part man part machine) they will make this sound really good but not give you the small which is most important of all (like race mixing) (kind after kind, born as a man die as a man)  merging man and software to enhance our human abilities (superpowers) which advertising will sound good & harmless but immediately this attaches to and changes your DNA and (hybrids cannot inherit the kingdom) you are no long in YAHWEH's Image but lucifers. This is the mark. The RFID Chip is a stepping stone to wireless downloads to your inboard computer attached to your DNA from the prince of the air (Transhumanism) a new hybrid Flesh (Miry Clay) and Technology (Iron) within our Temple where YAHWEH The Father Sets!

Dan 2:40  And a fourth kingdom will be strong as iron, and just as iron crushes and smashes everything, and as iron shatters all of these other metals, so it will crush and it will shatter these nations. 

Dan 2:41  And just as you saw the feet and the toes, partly potter's clay and partly iron, it will be a divided kingdom; and some hardness of the iron will be in it, just as you have seen the iron mixed with the wet clay. 

Dan 2:42  And as the toes of the feet were partly iron and partly clay, so part of the kingdom will be strong and partly brittle. 

Dan 2:43  And in that you saw the iron was mixed with wet clay, so they will mix in marriage and they will not cling to one another, just as iron does not mix with clay. 

Dan 2:44  And in the day of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, and the kingdom will not be left for another nation, and it will bring an end to all these kingdoms, but it will stand forever. 


Dan 2:45  Inasmuch as you saw that a stone from the mountain was chiseled out but not by hands, and that it crushed the iron, the bronze, the clay, the silver and the gold, thereby the great God made known to the king what will be in the future, and the dream is certain and its explanation trustworthy." 


The Stone made without hands Crushes all 4 kingdoms.


Luk 12:5  But I will show you whom you should fear: fear the one who has authority, after the killing, to throw you into hell! Yes, I tell you, fear this one! 


2Ti 1:7  For God has not given us a spirit of cowardice, but of power and love and self-discipline. 

Rom 8:13  For if you live according to the flesh, you are going to die, but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live. 

Rom 8:15  For you have not received a spirit of slavery leading to fear again, but you have received the Spirit of adoption, by whom we cry out, "Abba! Father!" 
Rom 8:16  The Spirit himself confirms to our spirit that we are children of God, 
Rom 8:17  and if children, also heirs—heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer together with him so that we may also be glorified together with him. 
Rom 8:18  For I consider that the sufferings of the present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that is about to be revealed to us. 

Rom 8:21  that the creation itself also will be set free from its servility to decay, into the glorious freedom of the children of God. 

Rom 8:28  And we know that all things work together for good for those who love God, for those who are called according to his purpose, 

Rom 8:30  And those whom he predestined, these he also called, and those whom he called, these he also justified, and those whom he justified, these he also glorified. 


Rom 8:31  What then shall we say about these things? If God is for us, who can be against us? 

When The Real King Arrives We Will Immediately be in our Spiritual Light Bodies The Flesh will Melt at His Presence into Spirit if you have it. So when you pinch yourself it will not cause pain. 

This is Our True Shepherd Who Sacrifices Himself to save His Sheep and death was swallowed up (lucifer demoted to prince of the air) for it Had No Power Over Him While His Clay lay in the tomb in Spirit He spent time with and shared The New Covenant with those who fell asleep during the B.C. Era!


2Pe 3:3  above all knowing this, that in the last days scoffers will come with scoffing, following according to their own desires 

2Pe 3:4  and saying, "Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things have continued just as they have been from the beginning of creation." 

2Pe 3:5  For when they maintain this, it escapes their notice that the heavens existed long ago and the earth held together out of water and through water by the word of God, 

2Pe 3:6  by means of which things the world that existed at that time was destroyed by being inundated with water. 

2Pe 3:7  But by the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly people. 

who the movie stars, illuminati and a lot of mumusiciansrade their soul and do the work of evil for YAHWEHS ADVERSARY 

Acquiring the mark of the beast system.  


The right hand symbolises work or allegiance to.

This is what Revelations is referring plus 

you should know if you are not trying 


100% to be obedient to Yahweh's Laws of 

His Kingdom ( the same 613) we have always had 

from the time of Adam. He will allow to you to backslide 

and slip back into babylon. 


He can read your Heart. You can't serve 2 masters 

and we are in a war. 

The loser perishes forever 

while the overcomers are rewarded with everlasting life 

which has already been written 

for those granted with eyes that see and ears that hear 

rightly dividing the word with discernment knowing truth 

from fiction and studying to show thyself approved.

The Sampson Option

is where Jews Nuke the entire World 

even if they are Nuked they believe they will 

reincarnate a few years later where no other race will 

so with this line of thought they will be the only winners 

of a nuclear holocaust WW III. 

JFK said we cannot allow them nukes

ever he understood who they were 

(the literal seed of satan) 

99% of humanity have no idea who their true enemies 

are or the devils progeny really exists and they are completely insane.

“Before 1941, 

enough was known about Stalin’s concentration camps, purges, 

show trials and state terror

that western leaders had no excuse for ignorance. 

Yet such was the desperate need for Soviet military assistance 

that all western suspicions were suspended.

During the war, there were thousands in London and Washington 

who had witnessed Stalin’s camps and murders. 

But they were effectively silenced by war censorship, 

and sometimes by military discipline. Officers caught discussing 

what they had heard about Stalin’s crimes were 

threatened with courts martial.

“Even Churchill, who had been a strident anti-Bolshevik 

and who admitted to ‘supping with the devil,’ 

warmed to the blandishments of success.

“When victory finally came, very few were willing to count 

the political and moral cost.

At the Nuremberg trials, 

three categories of criminal conduct were 

established: crimes against peace (i.e., wars of aggression)

war crimes and crimes against humanity.



(Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, Obama, Eric Holder, 

McCain, Reed, Pelosi & Israeli

 PM's (All of them alive today) should be Charged 

and Hung 

today and FDR, Stalin and 

Churchill & The Bolsheviks should have been 

the one's hung not the 

Germans).

“By any reckoning, Stalin’s regime deserved to stand trial on all counts. 

It had been expelled from the League of Nations 

for crimes against peace. 

While defeating the Wehrmacht, its forces had perpetrated 

numberless atrocities.

“And in pursuing policies of mass murder, 

mass deportation, repressions and ethnic cleansing 

the Soviet state had manifestly entered the realm of 

crimes against humanity.

“Yet in the victory euphoria, 

they need not have feared a public reprimand, 

let alone a formal accusation. 

When German defence lawyers at Nuremberg protested 

on this score, they were cut short by the chairman, Sir Geoffrey Lawrence.

“‘We are here to judge major war criminals,’ 

he reminded the court, ‘

not to try the prosecuting powers.’ 

Meanwhile, the notion of a general ‘liberation’ of Europe was false.

putin2

“But in eastern Europe, 

Soviet forces imposed a new tyranny as soon as the Nazi tyranny was crushed. 

Buchenwald was emptied of one set 

of inmates, then used for another.

“At the very time that Auschwitz 

was being liberated in January 1945, 

other camps like Majdanek 

were filling up with members of the 

resistance movement (our allies) 

whom the NKVD regarded as enemies.

“Wartime heroes, flown into continental Europe by SOE 

and the RAF, were cast into Soviet dungeons. 

Democrats were arrested, shot or put on trial.

Vast tides of innocents, 

including all Soviet prisoners of war 

who had survived German imprisonment, 

all so-called ‘repatriates’ handed over by western forces, 

and most of the slave workers 

returning home from Germany were shot 

or shipped off to the Gulag. 

Puppet dictatorships were introduced by force into country after country.”

Davies also indirectly cut the Goldhagen thesis to pieces when he said,

“For every European who was involved in the fighting of the Second War, there were at least ten civilians who were not directly involved but who nonetheless were forced to suffer the painful consequences of international conflict.”[22]

There was no way for Davies to survive the Zionist regime’s 

machination of historical events. 

But he certainly was not the only individual to challenge the powers that be. 

Listen to Norman Finkelstein in his 2000 book The Holocaust Industry:

“Articulating the key Holocaust dogmas, much of the literature on 

Hitler’s Final Solution is worthless as scholarship. 

Indeed, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense, 

if not sheer fraud.

 Especially revealing is the cultural milieu that 

nurtures this Holocaust literature.”

Finkelstein of course had people like Daniel Jonah Goldhagen,  

Eli Wiesel, and Deborah Lipstadt in mind. 

Those people can meticulously craft a palpable lie 

in such a way that the average person who knows little 

about World War II will accept it as brute facts. 

Why do you think that Elie Wiesel 

received so many accolades and media attention 

over the past few decades?

Lowe does not want to be another Zionist casualty or victim. 

He also should know that there is a book out there called 

Genocide Denial and the Law, in which it is stated 

in a perverse way that “Holocaust deniers” 

should face harsher punishments—such as imprisonment if necessary.

The premise of that particular book is absolutely worthless 

precisely because it can only be applied to “Nazi Holocaust.” 

If we extrapolate the same thesis to other historical events, then 

Jewish historians such as Bernard Lewis and others 

would be in jail for denying the Armenian genocide, 

an issue we will address in the future.

This is why Lowe can never be a good cop 

because he never got the intellectual and moral courage 

to tell us the real culprits 

who are playing fast and loose with historical artifacts.



Furthermore, Lowe does not tell us that major media publications 

such as the New York Times play a huge role 

in brainwashing the masses.

It just gets to a point now that the New York Times 

doesn't surprise thinking people anymore 

with countless stories of “Nazi Holocaust” and with little or 

no historical depth and honesty and fair balance.

It seems that editors and writers for the Times make sure that 

at least one story with respect to “the Holocaust” be published every month.

In fact, if you have been living on a steady diet of 

mass media and Hollywood manipulation 

in movies such as Inglorious Basterds—and to a lesser degree 

in HellboyCaptain America, etc.—

then you now know that Nazi Germany was the 

darkest era in recent memory.

Yet none of those editors and writers would be willing to publish the awful 

tragedies that literally fell upon the German civilians 

after the war precisely because that would ruin 

their daily whining and moaning.

That also means that some of those editors will have to find a serious and

 honest job other than 

producing hoaxes about Nazi Germany.

Writers and editors at the New York Times are certainly not oblivious to what has been happening in the historical world. 

They know pretty well that serious scholarly studies have been done over 

the past ten years unequivocally showing that German civilians 

indeed suffered tremendously after the war 

and the vast majority of those people had nothing to do with Nazi Germany.

Yet those New York Times writers continue to moan 

because the powers that be tell them what to think and what to write about. 

The powers that be tell us ad absurdum 

that no crime in history can be compared to what happened to the Jews 

in Nazi Germany. 

As Abraham Foxman himself declared a few years ago:

“The Holocaust is something different. It is a singular event.

It is not simply one example of genocide

but a nearly successful attempt

on the life of God's chosen children and, thus, on God himself.”

If the “Holocaust” is actually “a single event” 


and unique, then there is no way to compare it with other historical events. 



But the Dreadful Few always violate that rule whenever they 



want to destroy a new country or leader.

"Are you Goyim ready to get smashed through 'art'? Keep in mind that my work is going to 'fuck an entire generation.'"
“Are you Goyim ready to get smashed through ‘entertainment’? 


Keep in mind that my work is going to ‘fuck an entire generation.'”


Didn't they compare Saddam Hussein to Hitler?


Didn’t they produce fabrications 


saying that Ahmadinejad was another Hitler?


Didn't they place Vladimir Putin 


on the front page of the Times 



with a Hitler mustache?

Didn't Paul Johnson help the Dreadful Few by 


marshalling the ridiculous argument 



that Putin was following Hitler’s ideology?


Didn’t the Dreadful Few 


and their puppets preposterously 



declare that Assad joined Hitler in ideology?

As a corollary, if the Dreadful Few really believe that 


Hitler was that bad, why don't they go after Hollywood 



which, as some Jewish scholars have argued, aided Nazi Germany?

Nazi Germany was the greatest evil in the twentieth century, 


but Jewish towns such as Hollywood that actually helped 



Nazi Germany get a free pass? 



Does that make any sense at all? 



What the Dreadful Few end up saying is that if Hitler didn't exist, 



they would invent him.

Furthermore, why is it that we have hundreds upon hundreds of 


“Holocaust” movies and 



nothing about the Russian Holocaust, 



the Chinese Holocaust, the Vietnamese Holocaust, etc.?

Chinese scholar Mao Yushi, 


who actually was in his early 30s when Mao took over the country 



and who suffered tremendously as a result, 



recently declared that 



the Great Famine took the lives of 36 million people.


This is very close to what historian Frank Dikotter has said.

In a similar vein, Jo Lusby, head of China operations for Penguins, declared that


 “The Chinese people were cheated. They need real history.”

Indeed. They are still being cheated because the Holocaust establishment 


does not want to examine all historical events by the same standard. 



Everyone has to know about “Jewish Holocaust” 



and other historical events are just an afterthought.


Not one proven fact or one eyewitness 

who hasn't refuted their story when cross examined 

but naive americans believe if the jew puts it on tv 

or in a movie it must be true or they 

would get in trouble by the government. 

well it should work that way when history and a culture 

are deliberately destroyed 

to keep you in a perpetual state of ignorance the leaders are 

under a stronger delusion 

than the citizens are. Pretty sickening isn't it.

For example, Inglourious Basterds, which is about Jewish vengeance, received numerous accolades in the Jewish establishment 


when it came out. 



In fact, Abraham Foxman (just seeing this tools name in print makes me sick. 



I think of his hog head spitting out lie after lie but no one is there 



who knows truth to refute anything he says 



sounds like college with all the extreme left professors 



who would not know common since if it slapped them upside the head) 



declared that Inglorious Basterds “should be recognized 



with an Academy Award.”

It does not seem to bother Foxman that the movie contains graphically 

violent scenes and flashes of pornography; 

the end—Jewish vengeance—justifies the means.


Foxman concluded, “Hopefully the millions who see it will understand the 

horrors of the Holocaust and echo my view of ‘if only it were true!’”

Jewish producer Lawrence Bender ended up saying that 

Inglorious Basterds was actually “a Jewish wet dream.”

Bender continued to say that 

“we’re getting to live out a fantasy of revenge, 

getting to do what every Jew probably dreamed of.”

Jewish thought police Jeffrey Goldberg reported that

“Harvey and Bob Weinstein, the film’s executive producers, 

also reportedly enjoyed the film’s theme of Jewish revenge…

“Neal Gabler told me that Jewish revenge fantasies aren’t 

entirely alien to the movie industry, 

but they've always been exercises in sublimation, 

Superman being only the most obvious.”

French Jewish actress Melanie Laurent who played 

Shosanna Dreyfus in Inglourious Basterds, declared in an interview,

“When I read the script, I was like, wow, it’s been my dream to kill Hitler 

since I was like four so I was kind of like Shosanna already. 

I'm Jewish.

“I read the script together with my grandfather and he told me, 

‘You have to make that movie, please.’ 

So it was not just for me, it was for my family…

I’m the face of Jewish vengeance.”


In another interview, she said, “I think everyone has that sort of dream, 

to kill that sort of man [Adolf Hitler]. 

I think it’s kind of universal.”

Even rabbis extolled the movie as a perfect example of Jewish revenge. 

rabbi Jack Moline of Alexandria, Virginia, 

after attending an early screening of the film, 

declared to his congregation,

“To my surprise, my complete and utter surprise, 

there was something cathartic 

and deeply satisfying watching this revenge fantasy play out.

“It was as if something I did not dare admit—

my secret blood lust to do unto them what they did unto us—

was being acknowledged, 

permitted and validated. I was liberated from victimhood.”


In short, Inglourious Basterds is the modern poster-child for the theme 

that vengeance is a Jewish virtue. 

rabbi Meir Kahane—who founded “the Jewish Defense League (JDL) 

in the 1960s, 

a movement intended to counter acts of anti-Semitism”—

declared in 1980,

“Vengeance is a fundamental Jewish concept that is 

a precept, injunction, commandment for the Jew.”

Eli Roth, “The Bear Jew,” admitted,

“I grew up with this psychotic hatred of the Nazis 

and just these fantasies of killing them… It was very cathartic, 

it was extremely personal to do the role…

“So there is probably a lot more of me in Donny Donowitz 

and Donny Donowitz in me than I would care to admit.”

 Since the 1940s until the present, Hollywood has made sure that 

at least one or two “Holocaust” movies are released. 

Is there an agenda?

Let us ask Jewish Holocaust historian Tim Cole of the University of Bristol. 

He writes in the first page of his stunning book 

Selling the Holocaust: From Auschwitz to Schindler: 

How History is Bought, Packaged, and Sold,

“‘Shoah [Hebrew for Holocaust] business’ is big business…

[In] the twentieth century, the ‘Holocaust’ is being bought and sold.

$168 million was donated to pay for the building of the

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

on a plot of Federal Land in Washington, DC.

“Millions of dollars have financed memorial projects

throughout the United States, ranging from

the installation of Holocaust memorials

to the establishing of University chairs in Holocaust studies.
(Christianity Booted Out and 

Holohoax - Evolution Religions Moved In).

In 1960 The U.S. was #1 in Education. 

Today we are ranked # 39 right behind Botswana, Africa.

The jews dumbing down of America plan is working well. Teachers also must be proud!

I say shut the whole Public School System Down and save the $300 Billion per year.

Homeschool programs with materials are 10x better for about $600 Bucks instead of the $10,300 spent per student today for Communist Indoctrination.


Steven Spielberg’s movie Schindler’s List netted over

$221 million in foreign box offices and even Academy Awards.”[41]

Cole titled the prologue of his book 

“The Rise (and Fall?) of the

Myth of the ‘Holocaust.’”

It is high time that people of all stripes wake up against the 

Zionist/Neo-Bolshevik/Neoconservative machination of the West 

and much of the world because everyone will end up paying the price.

And this is where historian Thomas Goodrich’s meticulous study comes 

in. We will address his admirable book,

Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, in the next article.

Rape and Sex in German Cities After World War II Revisited (Part II)


“The women were raped, not once or twice but ten, twenty, thirty and a hundred times, and it was all the same to the Russians whether they raped mere children or old women.”[1]

  
goodrichVirtually nothing can be compared to what the Allied Forces did to German women after World War II. 

I honestly thought I knew enough about the brutal torture that the German civilians went through until I started 

reading Thomas Goodrich’s book.
M. Douglas’ Orderly and Humane 

is the most rigorous work I have ever read on this particular subject, 

but Douglas understandably did not or could not cover everything in a 500-page book.
I certainly was quite pleased and honored when a friend of mine asked me if I wanted to review 

Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947

She immediately got me in touch with the author, 

who graciously sent me a copy of the book.

If you have read Orderly and Humane and found it to be eye-opening, then there is no doubt that you will find Hellstorm worth your time. 

Goodrich is to be recommended for this painstakingly laborious work. 

He makes the historically convincing case that,

“Of all the methods used to express its anger, 

the Red Army said it best with rape. 

From eight to eighty, healthy or ill, indoors or out, in fields, on sidewalks, 

against walls, 

the spiritual massacre of German women continued unabated.

“When even violated corpses

could no longer be of use,

sticks, iron bars

and telephone receivers

were commonly rammed up their vaginas.”

We have documented in the past that rape was the most obvious 

form of revenge against the Germans. 

The fact is that things were a lot worse than one would ever have imagined.

One witness acknowledged,

“The Soviet Communist Bolsheviks were coming and going the whole time 

and they kept eyeing us greedily. 

The nights were dreadful because we were never safe for a moment.

“The women were raped, 

not once or twice but ten, twenty, thirty and a hundred times, 

and it was all the same to the Russians (bolshevik communist jews) 

they had already killed all the true white native russians.

whether they raped mere children or old women.

“The youngest victim in the row houses where we lived 

was ten years of age and the oldest one was over seventy. . . . 

I am sure that wild and hungry animals 

would not have behaved any differently.”

Then this moving account by a young girl:

“When we were lying in bed at night 

we kept hearing steps coming up the stairs. 

. . . They beat on the door with their rifle-butts, until it was opened. 

Without any consideration for my mother and aunt, 

who had to get out of bed, we were raped by the Soviets, 

who always held a machine pistol in one hand.

“They lay in bed with their dirty boots on, until the next lot came. 

As there was no light, everything was done by pocket torches, 


and we did not even know what the beasts looked like.”[3]



Thomas Goodrich
Thomas Goodrich
As we shall see, this is not an isolated case. 

How would you feel if your entire family 

was literally raped in public, in churches, 

around the clock, and in broad daylight—

sometimes right in front of you?

How would you react if your mother was raped in

your presence, or if your young sister was literally 

sexually tortured just two steps away 

from where you stand?

After a German by the name of Leonora was forcefully told 

to undress some German young girls for the Soviets, 

“The Commissar told me to watch and learn how to turn 

the Master Race (the Germans are the true pure white Israelite 

descendants from the tribe of Judah the man who had Pharez & Zarah 

(founders of Troy, Rome, Athens and London) with Tamar Judah holds 

the Sceptre and Joseph the Birthright) into whimpering bits of 

misery.

Listen to what happened next:

“Now two Poles (most likely diabolic spiritless jews historically 99% of the time only they are able to enjoy this type of evil with other satanists)  came in, dressed only in trousers, 

and the girls cried out at their sight. 

They quickly grabbed the first of the girls, 

and bent her backwards over the edge of the table until her joints cracked.

“I was close to passing out as one of them took his knife

and, before the very eyes of the other girls,

cut off her right breast.

He paused for a moment, then cut off the other side.

I have never heard anyone scream as desperately as that girl.

“After this operation he drove his knife into her abdomen

several times, which again was accompanied by

the cheers of the Communist bolshevik jews called Russians.

“The next girl cried for mercy,

but in vain—

it even seemed that the gruesome deed was done

particularly slowly because she was especially pretty.

“The other three had collapsed,

they cried for their mothers and begged for a quick death,

but the same fate awaited them as well.

“The last of them was still almost a child,

with barely developed breasts.

They literally tore the flesh off her ribs until the white bones showed.

“Another five girls were brought in.

They had been carefully chosen this time,

all of them were well-developed and pretty.

When they saw the bodies of their predecessors

they began to cry and scream.

Weakly, they tried desperately to defend themselves,

but it did them no good as the Poles grew ever more cruel.

Germany after WWII
Germany after WWII
“They sliced the body of 

one of them open lengthwise 


and poured in a can of 


machine oil, which they tried to 


light. 

A Bolshevik Jew Communist shot one 

of the other girls in the genitals before 

they cut off her breasts.

Loud howls of jewish approval began when 

someone brought a saw from a tool chest. 

This was used to tear up the breasts of the other girls, which soon caused 

the floor to be awash in blood. 

The bolsheviks were in a blood frenzy. 

More girls were being brought in continually.

“I saw these grisly proceedings as through a red haze. 

Over and over again I heard the terrible screams when the breasts 

were tortured, and the loud groans at the mutilation of the genitals. . . .

“[I]t was always the same, the begging for mercy

the high-pitched scream when the breasts were cut and the groans 

when the genitals were mutilated. The slaughter was interrupted 

several times to sweep the blood out of the room and clear away the bodies.

“When my knees buckled I was forced onto a chair. 

The Commissar always made sure that I was watching, and when 

I had to throw up they even paused in their tortures. 

One girl had not undressed completely, she may also have been 

a little older than the others, who were around seventeen years of age.

“They soaked her bra with oil and set in on fire, and while she screamed, 

a thin iron rod was shoved into her vagina until it came out her navel.

“In the yard entire groups of girls were clubbed to death after 

the prettiest of them had been selected for this torture. 

The air was filled with the death cries of many hundred girls.”[5]

That is just the beginning. One German Victim Lamented,

“[A] big bolshevik came in. He did not utter a single word, but looked around 

the room and then went to the back where all 

the young girls and women were sitting. He beckoned 

once with his finger to my sister.

“As she did not stand up at once, he went close up to her 

and held his machine pistol against her chin.

“Everyone screamed aloud, but my sister sat mutely there and 

was incapable of moving. Then a shot resounded. Her head fell to the side 

and the blood streamed out. She was dead instantly, 

without uttering a single sound.

“The bullet had gone from her chin to her brain and her skull 

was completely shattered. The Bolshevik looked at us all, 

and went away again.”

Some soldiers, who did not know that those beastly behaviors 

were taking place, later declared,

“The mothers had had to witness how their ten and twelve-year-old 

daughters were raped by some 20 men; the daughters in turn 

saw their mothers being raped, even their grandmothers. 

Women who tried to resist were brutally tortured to death. 

There was no mercy.

“The women we liberated were in a state almost impossible to describe. . . .

Their faces had a confused, vacant look. Somewhere beyond speaking to,

 ran up and down and moaned the same sentences over and over again.

“Having seen the consequences of these bestial atrocities, we were terribly 

agitated and determined to fight. We knew the war was past winning; but it 

was our obligation and sacred duty to fight to the last bullet.”


No girl or nun one was exempt from being raped

One woman came to her priest and lamented, “father, I can't go on living! 

Thirty of them raped me last night.”[8]

Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill

This fat piece of shit sacrificed many lives because Germany Industry was out producing England and jews had declared war on Germany in 1933 for ending their jew controlled federal reserve that had crash the German Economy and stolen the wealth of the nation like the U.S. Today.

For some reason jews believe it is their right alone to create money out of thin air and Charge every Nation 
Interest for it. 

They have started Wars and/or Assassinated Anyone or Any Nation that tried to manage their own finances which can & should be done interest free.

One priest declared,

“The girls, women and nuns were raped

 incessantly for hours on end, the 

soldiers standing in queues, the officers

 at the head of the queues, 

in front of their victims.

“During the first night many of the nuns and women were raped as many as fifty times. 

Some of the nuns who resisted with all their strength were shot, others were ill-treated in a dreadful manner until they were too exhausted 

to offer any resistance.

“The Bolsheviks knocked them down, kicked them, 


beat them on the head and in the face with the butt-end of their 

revolvers and rifles, until they finally collapsed and in this unconscious 

condition became the helpless victims of brutish passion, 


which was so inhuman as to be inconceivable.

The Germanic Aryans killed by Bolsheviks in Russia Eastern Europe and Germany were of The True Tribe of Judah who did not Race Mix (selling their birthright like esau) or Betray Our Father YAHWEH with a contrary religion from the adversary of humanity.

Oba 1:18  And the house of Jacob will be a fire and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau stubble; and they will set them on fire and will consume them. And there will not be a survivor for the house of Esau," for Yahweh has spoken. 

Jewish Encyclopedia states modern jewry is esau/ edom.


“The same dreadful scenes were enacted in the hospitals, 

homes for the aged and other such institutions. Even nuns who were 

seventy and eighty years old and were ill and bedridden 

were raped and ill-treated by these bolshevik barbarians.

All of Europe were in great fear of the Communist Red Army . 

German's (Tribe of Judah Descendants) with over a million other volunteers from over 30 countries and the Italians (Tribe of Gad Descendants) were the only ones in the world fighting, trying to end communism and liberate Europeans and White Russians (not communist turkish or asiatic) who were dying in the Siberian Gulags at a rate of 4 million a year under these diabolic communist jewish rabbi's who called themselves bolsheviks.

Today they are the same tribe, same plan of world domination under their father lucifer (latin) to confuse history changed their name to neo-cons or progressive liberals democrat or republican.



In a diary of a Catholic priest from Kloster Brueck we read:

January 21st, 1945. . . . Strange to say, the population intends to 

remain here, and is not afraid of the Russians.
“The reports that in one village they raped all the women

and abducted all the men and took them away to work

somewhere must surely have been exaggerated.

How dreadful it would be if Goebbels was telling the truth after all!…
“January 25th. All night long soviets entered the chapel and searched and questioned us. They ordered the woman to go outside with her small child. . .

“[They] raped the woman and sent her back to us.

She came back to the chapel, her small child in her arms,

the tears streaming down her face. . . .

“During the morning three women from the village came to the chapel. 

The vicar hardly recognized them, for their faces were distorted with fear 

and terror. They told us that whole families had been shot by the Bolsheviks. . . .

“Girls who had refused to allow themselves to be raped, and parents who had

 sought to protect their  children, had been shot on the spot. . . .

January 27th.We priests were allowed out of the chapel for half an hour 

today in order to bury Margarethe in the yard. Poor girl, it is a good thing 

you were dead and so did not know what the Russians did to your body!

January 28th. The night was very troubled again. . . .Many of the nuns 

are getting very distressed and nervous. They sleep even less than we do.

 I often hear them say, ‘If only we had fled before the Russians arrived!’”

One individual who actually spoke with the soldiers later wrote,

“In every village and town they entered, the German troops came upon 

scenes of horror: slain boys, People’s Army men drenched with gasoline 

and burned—and sometimes survivors to tell the tale of the outrages.

“In some villages, they surprised Bolshevik warm in the beds of women they 

had taken, and found the bodies of the many French war prisoners who had 

died defending German women and children.

“Staggered by what he had seen and heard, a German officer tried desperately 

to make sense of the disaster; to understand the minds of men ‘who find . . .

 pleasure in raping the same woman over and over, dozens of times, even 

while other women are standing near.’”[11]

Goodrich notes,

“Those women pregnant, on their menstrual cycle, 

or enduring diarrhea, suffered like all the rest. Nothing, it seemed—

not age, ailment or ugliness—could repel the Red rapist. 

Even death was no defense.

“‘I . . . saw some twenty Communist Red Army men standing in line before the corpse 

of a woman certainly beyond sixty years of age who had been raped to death

,’ one sickened witness recorded. ‘They were shouting and laughing and 

waiting for their satisfaction over her dead body.’


Ask yourself again: how would you feel if members of your family 

were raped in ditches and even by the way sides—“and as a rule not once 

but several times”?

Or how about “a whole bunch of soldiers” seizing your precious little sister 

and raping her?[13] Or how about raping your 69-year old grandmother? 

Or how about finding your lovely young teacher into the woods and, 

well, used her like a female dog?

“They drove her out on the road stark naked, and many soldiers used 

her one after the other. She reached her village crawling on hands and knees 

along the ditch, through mud and snow.”

Furthermore, what if soldiers of the Allied Forces told you that you had 

no option but to watch your family being beaten and raped? 

Wouldn't that be worse than nightmare?

How would you continue to live with that kind of moral degradation and 

sexual replay in your mind? 

Do you see why many of those precious women and even their children 

ended up committing suicide?


One rape victim confessed,


“We screamed, we begged them to leave us in peace,

but they showed us no mercy.

We resolved to end our lives. Everyone had a knife and a piece

of rope. Frau P. was first. Young Frau K. hanged her daughter

and then herself. Her dear mother did the same with her sister.

“Now only two of us remained. I asked her to fix my rope for I was too upset to do it. Then we embraced one more time and kicked the luggage away on which we had stood.

“I, however, could touch the floor with my toes . . .

the rope was too long. I tried over and over—I wanted to die.

I looked to the right and to the left, we hung in a row.

They were well off, they were dead. As for me,

I had no choice but to free myself from the rope.”


Again, raping innocent civilians happened in nearly all the major cities 

of Germany. Goodrich writes,

“Soon after the fall of Danzig, hundreds of women and girls pleaded with 

an officer for protection. The Bolshevik pointed to a Catholic cathedral.

“After the females were safely inside, the officer yelled to his men, 

motioned to the church, and with bells ringing and organ pipes roaring 

the horror continued all night. Some women inside were raped more than 

thirty times.

“‘They even violated eight-year-old girls and shot boys who tried to 

shield their mothers,’ groaned a priest.”

“Some women and children were assaulted ten, twenty, 

even thirty times 



a night and for a female to be ravished one hundred times 



a week was not uncommon. ‘

One could hardly any longer call it raping . . . ,’ a victim moaned.”[17]

If you are upset about what you have read so far, fasten your seat belt. 

By the way, the Jews did go down to the beastly level. 

One priest from Rosenberg declared,

Bolshevik soldiers even went so far as to violate some of the female

corpses that lay in the mortuary at the cemetery prior to burial.”

These are sick demonic being. Yes they are really the seed 

(children) of the devil.

Gen 3:15  And I will put hostility between you and between the woman, and between your offspring and between her offspring; he will strike you on the head, and you will strike him on the heel." 


Rape was one thing, but there was a lot more than that. The Bolshevik Jew 

Communists took over the Education System in Germany after the event 

and began to brainwash young and impressionable people with their 

perverse version of history.

Homeschool was outlawed.

Now here is the question: when was the last time you read a popular history 

book which honestly deals with those historical facts?

And do you think that Jewish ideologues like Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, Lucy 

Dawidowicz, Deborah Lipstadt, Jonah Goldberg, Max Boot, Bill Kristol, David 

Horowitz (to name just a few), will let you know about those stubborn facts? 

Wouldn't that ruin their Zionist/diabolical heaven on earth?

If you are an avid reader and cannot remember the last time you pick

up a book which addresses these issues, you have to admit that  


you have been scammed and lied to.



Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Alexander Solzhenitsyn observed then,

“All of us knew very well that if the girls were

Germans they could be raped and then shot.



This was almost a combat distinction.”

Solzhenitsyn was not speaking metaphorically. 

Some German civilians thought that they were 

safe when they found a shelter in a woodland barn 

near Schoeneiche. But, as we all know, 

appearance can be deceiving:

“They burst in, drunk with vodka 

and with victory, looking for women. When they 

saw only older women and children hiding behind a pile of carpets, they must 

have suspected that somewhere younger bodies were being concealed, and 

they started to ram their bayonets into the carpets. Here and there 

first and then systematically. . . .

“Nobody knows how many young girls were killed instantly that night. 

Eventually, the muffled cries of anguish and pain gave the hiding places 

away, and the victors started unrolling their prey. They chased those girls 

that had remained unhurt through the barn. . . .

“By then the barn looked like a battle field with wounded women on the 

floor right next to screaming and fighting victims forced to endure repeated 

and violent acts of rape.”

It would be historically and morally proper to call this chapter in history 


the German Holocaust. 


And it is morally disgusting and despicable to say that those 

German civilians deserved what had happened to them, as 

some hoaxers have ridiculously suggested in the past.

When all is said and done, German cities were literally 

burned to ashes, people who were just “lucky” to survive the atrocities 

were devastated and morally humiliated, and major European countries 

were just scared to death to shelter people of German origins. 

In other words, the Allied Forces ideologically killed two birds with one stone.

The holy trinity
The unholy trinity
Goodrich noted that there was an abiding hatred “of the Christian religion, particularly the Catholic Church,” among 

“hard-core jewish communists.” As an example, Goodrich quoted a priest from Grottkau saying,

“He [One Jewish Bolshevik Communist Russian Soldier] was utterly godless and the sight of my priest’s robe apparently infuriated him. He kept insisting that I deny the existence of God and, seizing hold of my breviary, threw it onto the floor.

“Finally, he dragged me out into the street and pushed me against a wall in order to shoot me. . . . 

He had just placed me against the wall when all the men, women and children, who had been sheltering in the house . . . 

appeared on the scene. They stood around us, pale and terrified.

“Thereupon he began to scatter the crowd by shooting at random 

in every direction. When he and I were finally alone once more 

he pointed his revolver at me, but it was empty.

“He started reloading it, but whilst he was doing so, 

two other officers, who had apparently heard the shots, 

came into sight. They rushed up to him and snatched the revolver 

from his grasp. . . . [then] dragged him away.”

Another priest wrote,

“He stood at the altar like a lord and eyed us triumphantly. Then he ordered our old vicar to go outside with him. After a quarter of an hour they returned. The expression on the vicar’s face was dreadful.

He collapsed in front of the altar, muttering, ‘Shoot me, but shoot me here, at the altar. I refuse to leave the altar!’—The nuns screamed, 

‘Don't shoot! Don't shoot!’ The diabolic insane Bolshevik grinned, triumphant in his power and strength.With a lordly gesture he walked away from the vicar.”

Goodrich writes,

“Lucky in these cases, most clergymen were not so fortunate.

Many died in the prescribed Marxist manner:

Bullet to the neck and skull bashed to bits.

For some Bolsheviks, nuns were an especial target of debasement.

Reveals a priest from Kloste Kloster Brueck

“‘They had been tortured and raped by officers for several hours. Finally they returned, their faces swollen and beaten black and blue. . . .

[At] the neighboring village. . . . the Communists made all the nuns assemble in one room.

“‘Some of the younger nuns had managed to hide in the nick of time, in the water-cistern up in the attic.

The rest of them were treated in a dreadful manner.

They tried to defend themselves, but it was of no avail.

“‘They were brutally raped by the Russians,—even the oldest nuns, who were eighty.

For four hours the Russians ransacked the house, behaving like wild animals.

In the morning they then boasted in the village that there were no longer any virgins at the convent.’

“‘The nuns were completely exhausted when they came back. . . .

We all sat there huddled together in one small room and prayed.’”[24]

When cities and towns basically ceased to exist, The Red Army focused on the countryside.

“Barns were burned, grain destroyed, even orchards and nurseries were chopped down or deliberately flattened by armored vehicles. Relates a Russian soldier:

“‘A lieutenant unsheathed a knife, walked up to a cow, and struck her a death-blow at the base of the skull. The cow’s legs folded under, and she fell, while the rest of the herd, bellowing madly, stampeded and ran away.

“The officer wiped the sharp edge on his boots and said: ‘My father wrote to me that the Germans had taken a cow from us. Now we are even.’”[25]


 The historical evidence is now clear: it is ludicrous to apply the adjective “unique” to “Nazi Holocaust.” German civilians had to endure a lot worse.
We certainly have been hoodwinked by the Holocaust establishment and the Zionist narrative, but there is hope. And Goodrich’s Hellstorm is certainly a superb material in this ideological war precisely because Goodrich plays by the historical rules.He documents,

“Old men who had feebly 

tried to protect their wives, daughters and 

granddaughters, were themselves knocked down, 

then sawed in half or chopped to bits.

“A group of over fifty French POWs and Polish workers who had instinctively stepped in to protect the people were likewise castrated and killed.”

I wonder how dark their diabolic minds must be as to be capable 

to inflict such cruelty with pleasure? 

Absolutely No Love and Zero Light Available In that Vessel!

Because of these atrocities, many of the well-known places in Germany quickly became vacant. Citing a physician with the army by the name of Lt. Heinrich Amberger, Goodrich writes, “Neither in Nemmersdorf nor in the other places did I find a single living German civilian.” Amberger previously declared,

“On the road through Nemmersdorf, near the bridge . . . I saw where a whole trek of refugees had been rolled over by Russian tanks; not only the wagons and teams, but also a goodly number of civilians, mostly women and children. . 

“[They] had been squashed flat by the tanks. At the edge of the road and in the farm yards lay quantities of corpses of civilians who evidently . . . had been murdered systematically.”

Another witness recounted,

“In the farmyard further down the road stood a cart, to which four naked women were nailed through their hands in a cruciform position. . . . 

Beyond . . . stood a barn and to each of its two doors a naked woman was nailed through the hands, in a crucified posture.

“In the dwellings we found a total of seventy-two women, including children, and one old man, 74, all dead . . . all murdered in a bestial manner, except only a few who had bullet holes in their necks. 


Some babies had their heads bashed in.


“In one room we found a woman, 84 years old, sitting on a sofa . . . half of whose head had been sheared off with an ax or a spade.”


In short, from 1944 to 1947, it was the worst time in history to be a German.

 Goodrich continues,
“For millions of Germans cut off on the Baltic coast by the rapid Russian advance, only one avenue of escape remained open—the sea. 

Even here, however, Soviet aircraft controlled the skies above and submarines prowled unseen below.

“In the various ports along the coast, thousands upon thousands of ragged, frozen refugees pressed to the water’s edge in hopes of landing a spot on one of the few vessels available. 

The numbers were so great and the fear so consuming that efforts to board when ships did dock often resembled riots.

“‘The crush to get on board was just terrible,’ a witness wrote from Pillau. ‘I saw a pram being squeezed out of all recognition by the pushing masses. 

One old man fell into the water and there was nothing one could do in the crush—also it was so cold he would have died on hitting the water.’

“Because armed guards had orders to evacuate as many women and children as possible, babies were used like tickets, with half-crazed mothers tossing infants down to relatives on the pier. Some children landed safely; some did not.

“If anything, the situation at Gotenhafen was even more horrific. As the Wilhelm Gustloff made ready to take on passengers in late January 1945, the ship’s crew were stunned by what they saw.

“‘There must have been 60,000 people on the docks . . . ,’ remembered second engineer,Walter Knust.

“‘[A]s soon as we let down the gangways people raced forward and pushed their way in. In the confusion a lot of children got separated from their parents. 

Either the kids got on board leaving their parents on the harbor or the children were left behind as their parents got pushed forward by the throng.’

“A former cruise liner designed to accommodate two thousand passengers and crew, by the time the Gustloff cast ropes on January 30, the beautiful white ship had taken on as many as six thousand refugees. Even so, as she backed away from port, her path was blocked by smaller craft jammed with people.

“‘Take us with you,’ the refugees cried. ‘Save the children!’

“‘We put down nets and everybody on the small ships scrambled up as best they could,’ said the Gustloff ’s radio operator, Rudi Lange.

“‘As we got under way I think I remember being told by one of the ship’s officers to send a signal that another 2,000 people had come aboard…’”[30]

“When rescue ships later reached the scene, they pulled from the icy waters a mere nine hundred survivors. 

All else—roughly 7,000 men, women and children—were lost.

“Even then, however, the nightmare did not end. When rescue vessels touched land, scores of victims were disembarked at Gotenhafen.

“Thus, in less than twenty-four hours, after a harrowing night of incredible terror, some refugees found themselves on the very docks they had hoped to leave, once again searching desperately for a way to escape.”[31]

roosevel 
We must never forget that the leaders of the Allied Forces—Joseph Stalin, Franklin Roosevelt, and Winston Churchill—are largely responsible for what happened to the German civilians during that time. 

As Goodrich rightly puts it,

“Despite the obvious dissimilarities of the men, intellectual as well as physical, each shared a characteristic with the other that shrank into insignificance all outer contradictions—all three harbored an inveterate hatred of not only Adolf Hitler and Nazism, but Germans and Germany.”[32]

Churchill was probably the most dishonest of them all precisely because he wrote in 1920 that the Bolshevik Revolution sought to bring down Western civilization. He even wrote specifically that

“It is sheer humbug to pretend that it [Bolshevism] is not far worse than German militarism.”

Churchill unambiguously moved on to declare,

“Bolshevism is not a policy, it is a disease…

Civilization is being completely extinguished over gigantic areas while Bolsheviks hop and caper like troops of ferocious baboons aid the ruins of cities and the corpses of their victims. 

I will not submit to be beaten by the baboons.”

England, Churchill added, needed to fight “against the foul baboonery of Bolshevism.” Moreover, those who supported Bolshevism were “typhus-bearing vermin.”

But Churchill ended forging a dubious alliance with the very diabolical force which sought to bring down Western civilization. So, was Churchill a “typhus-bearing vermin” for making an alliance with the greatest mass murderer (Stalin) in the history of warfare?

As Christ declared, one way to test whether a tree is 

good or bad is by looking at its fruit. 

You simply cannot say that an orange tree is good 

if it keeps producing rotten oranges.

What, then, was the fruit of the fraudulent alliance with Stalin? Was it really good? Or did it bring misery to the Germans who, according to Churchill himself, were less culpable than the Bolsheviks? The answer is yes.

Churchill, then, proved that you cannot be a flaming Zionist without living in the state of confusion and contradiction. He was like a squirrel that cannot decide to go right or left. 


Historian Ralph Raico himself points out that 

“Churchill never had a principle he did not in the end betray”

and was known as an “opportunist.” Raico continues,

“He had twice changed his party affiliation—from Conservative to Liberal, and then back again…

“As head of the Board of Trade before World War I, he opposed increased armaments; after he became First Lord of the Admiralty in 1911, he pushed for bigger and bigger budgets, spreading wild rumors of the growing strength of the German navy, just as he did in the 1930s about the buildup of the German Air Force.

“He attacked socialism before and after World War I, while during the War he promoted war socialism, calling for nationalization of the railroads, and declaring in a speech: ‘Our whole nation must be organized, must be socialized if you like the word…

“He was an early and fervent opponent of Bolshevism. For years, he—very correctly—decried the ‘bloody baboons’ and ‘foul murderers of Moscow.’

“In an Italy teetering on the brink of Leninist revolution, II Duce had discovered the one formula that could counteract the Leninist appeal: hypernationalism with a social slant.

“Churchill lauded ‘Fascino’s triumphant struggle against the 

bestial appetites and passions of Leninism,’ claiming that 

‘it proved the necessary antidote to the Communist poison.’

“Yet the time came when Churchill made his peace with Communism. In 1941, he gave unconditional support to Stalin, welcomed him as an ally, embraced him as a friendHe repeatedly announced, of Stalin: ‘I like that man.’

Ilya Ehrenberg
Ilya Ehrenberg
“Obsessed not only with defeating Hitler, but with destroying Germany, Churchill was oblivious to the danger of a Soviet inundation of Europe until it was far too late.

“The symbolic climax of his infatuation came at the November, 1943, Tehran conference, when Churchill presented Stalin with a Crusader’s sword.”

Yet as he began to see that the destruction of Dresden was a lot worse than he could ever have imagined, the same Churchill began to distance himself from his own ideological/Zionist notion. He wrote,

“It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretextsshould be reviewed.

“The destruction of Dresden remains a serious query against 

the conduct of Allied bombing. . . . 

I feel the need for more precise concentration upon military objectives . . . rather than on mere acts of terror and wanton destruction.”

In nutshell, Churchill was politically a Zionist puppet who ended up prostrating before the Dreadful Few. In return, they reciprocally gave him virtually political and lucrative leverage.

“Churchill had been a strong Zionist practically from the start, holding that Zionism would deflect European Jews from social revolution to partnership with European imperialism in the Arab world.

“Now, in 1936, he forged links with the informal London pressure group known as The Focus, whose purpose was to open the eyes of the British public to the one great menace Nazi Germany.

“‘The great bulk of its finance came from Jewish businessmen such as Sir Robert Mond (a director of several chemical firms) and Sir Robert Waley-Cohn, the managing director of Shell, the latter contributing 50,000 [pounds].”
Churchill, Raico writes,

“exaggerated the extent of German rearmament, formidable as it was, and distorted its purpose by harping on German production of heavy bombers.

“This was never a German priority, 

and Churchill’s fabrications were meant to demonstrate a German design to attack Britain, 

Which was never Hitler’s intention until after the war began.



In America, Roosevelt was working night and day to convince the American people that a war against Germany was in the interest of the United States. He declared privately,

“I would like to see the Germans on the breadline for fifty years.”

When the Japanese finally attacked the U.S. in 1941—and Roosevelt and top military and policy advisors knew that the attack would happen—Roosevelt’s dream actually came true: America must get involved in World War II.

Robert S. Stinnett, who went to World War II as a naval photographer 

and who later found out that 

Roosevelt had 

deceived the American people, declared that

“The decision he [Roosevelt] made, in concert with his advisors, was to provoke Japan through a series of actions into an overt act: the Pearl Harbor attack.”[45]

When the dust finally was settled, the holy trinity—Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt—was covertly planning to destroy Germany and reduce the whole country to ashes. But Stalin had to pretend that he was only fighting against war criminals:

“Lest anyone doubt Stalin’s intentions once his legions gained control in Germany, the reality was made crystal clear at the Teheran Conference in 1943.

“Lifting his glass of vodka for the ‘umpteenth toast,” the communist leader suddenly announced, ‘I propose a salute to the swiftest possible justice for all of Germany’s war criminals—justice before a firing squad.

“‘I drink to our unity in dispatching them as fast as we capture them, all of them, and there must be at least 50,000 of them.’
“When Churchill, well into his cups, angrily protested—‘The British people will never stand for such mass murder. . . . without a proper trial!’—Stalin smiled, his eyes twinkled and overall he seemed ‘hugely tickled.’
“‘Perhaps,’ the American president interrupted, ‘we could say that instead of summarily executing 50,000 we should settle on a smaller number. Shall we say 49,500?’”

Why must there be at least 50,000 of them? Wasn't Stalin presupposing that those prisoners of war were all guilty?

But the sad part was that both Roosevelt and Churchill later called Stalin “Uncle Joe” and then added,

“He is a man who combines a tremendous, relentless determination with a stalwart good humor.

“I believe he is representative of the heart and soul of Russia; and I believe that we are going to get along very well with him and the Russian people—very well indeed.”



The next time you meet a screaming propagandist from the Holocaust establishment, ask him about the German Holocaust—most specifically the German civilians.  (I had a private interaction with Michael Shermer a few years ago and I certainly was surprised to see that the man breaths and lives in contradictions.

Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield
The same historical machination is happening in France as well. Catherine Mon Fajon Author of a documentary, lamented,

“That silence is amazing and amazed me. France was the third country most bombed by the Allies after Germany and Japan and it is hardly mentioned in our history books.”

If the propagandist still wants specific examples, ask him what Ilya Ehrenburg meant when he knew very well that German civilians had been raped by the thousands. Ehrenburg unambiguously said:

“The Germans have been punished, but not enough, The Fritzes are still running, but not lying dead.Who can stop us now? . . . The Oder? The Volkssturm

“No, it’s too late Germany, you can whirl around in circles, and burn, and howl in your deathly agony; the hour of revenge has struck!”

Ehrenburg, by the way, was just implementing what Stalin had previously done to the peasants in 1932 and 1933.

So, whenever representatives of the Holocaust establishment start meowing day and night, you can simply ignore them, since no one has yet to douse them with a bucket of water.

For example, listen to how Jewish ideologue Daniel Greenfield indirectly defended what happened after World War II:

“By the time World War II was over entire cities had been devastated and hundreds of thousands of civilians had been killed by the Allies in one of the last wars whose virtue we were all able to agree on….

“To the professional pacifist these numbers appear to disprove the morality of war, any war, but they were the blood price that had to be paid to stop two war machines once they had been allowed to seize the strategic high ground.

“There was no other way to stop the genocide that Germany and Japan had been inflicting on Europe and Asia except through a way of war that would kill countless civilians.

“A refusal to fight that war would not have been the moral course. It would have meant that the Allies would have continued to serve as the silent partners in genocide. The same thing is true today.”

Greenfield moves on to say:

“War is ugly. It is made moral by why it is fought, not by how it is fought.  If we are fighting a war to prevent mass murder, our moral obligation is to win it as quickly as possible. Not as cleanly.”

Isn’t this man implicitly making a case for Hitler? Wasn’t the Third Reich primarily targeting Jewish Bolshevism, which was literally liquidating Russian peasants by the millions? Hitler also said in Mein Kampf that

“the part which the Jews played in the social phenomenon of prostitution, and more especially in the white slavery traffic, could be studied here better than any other West-European city, with the possible exception of certain ports of Southern France…

“A cold shiver ran down my spine when I first ascertained that it was the same colcold bloodedhick-skinned and shameless Jew who showed his consummate skill in conducting that revolting exploitation of the dregs of the big city. Then I became fired with wrath.”

Whether you agree or disagree with Hitler’s ideological move in order to solve the “Jewish question,” the fact is that prostitution and white slavery were in the guiding hands of the Dreadful Few.

If you doubt this, just pick up a copy of Prostitution and Prejudice: The Jewish Fight Against White Slavery, 1870-1939 by Jewish historian Edward J. Bristow.

Upon reading just the first page, you will quickly find out that the prostitution business ranged from “almost all parts of North and South Africa, to India, China, Japan, Philippine Islands, North and South America, and also to many of the countries of Europe” where “Yiddish speaking Jews are maintaining a regular flow of Jewesses, trafficked solely for the purpose of prostitution.”

This was the case in virtually all the major countries in all the continents.

Hitler’s anger began to escalate after World War I when he saw what was happening in the press and theatre in Germany, when art in general was being used to denigrate the German culture.

What perhaps moved Hitler’s anger to a new height was that the Jews were less than three percent of the population, yet they largely controlled the theatre and were promoting what he would call “filth” and “pornography.” For Hitler, these acts “must have been definitely intentional.”

If Hitler was wrong then for saying this, David Cronenberg proved him right. Cronenberg himself declared that his art—and that is pornography—is

“subversive in some way. And that means that you cannot possibly abide by this sort of the rules of politeness and decorum that many mainstream movies thrive on…

“Real art must be subversive of the status quo to some extent. It doesn't mean that you are preaching political revolution necessarily—although that would be a possibility.

“It’s inevitable, then, that if you consider yourself an artist, you are going to bother people, that you are going to disturb people and that you are going to knock over a few walls…

“There is an urge to get under the surface of things. Sometimes I do that literally….That does upset a lot of people. And it’s an inevitable consequence of being a serious artist.

As we have documented in previous articles and as other writers have pointed, the Weimar Republic proved that at least Hitler had a point. 

The only way that the Dreadful Few could have proved him wrong was to stay away from polluting the culture and from immersing themselves into Bolshevik ideology.

Lastly, Hitler did not show his “wrath” toward all Jews, as there were thousands upon thousands of people of Jewish descent in Nazi Germany. But once Hitler began to realize that the Jewish question ran deep, he declared,

“I had now no more hesitation about bringing the Jewish problem to light in all its details. No. Henceforth I was determined to do so.”[59]

For Hitler, Communism, Marxism, and Bolshevism, which were clearly Jewish movements both in Germany and elsewhere, were destroying Germany; therefore those who espoused such views must be dealt with.

Hitler was not the only one to agree about this. 

Europe was scared to death of Bolshevism and Communism, and Nazi Germany was largely a reaction to Jewish subversive movements.


Mar 14:58  We heard him say, I will destroy this temple that is made with hands, and within three days I will build another made without hands. 



Today subversive jews have the masses distracted looking towards jerusalem for a temple to be built when it would not matter one way or the other to prophesy, to Yahweh and Yahshua Christ 
if they built ten of them tomorrow.

1Co 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?

1Co 3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

1Co 3:18 Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.

1Co 3:19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

1Co 3:20 And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.

1Co 3:21 Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are your's;

1Co 3:22 Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come; all are your's;

1Co 3:23 And ye are Christ's; and Christ is God's. 

In short, no Jewish subversive movementsno Nazi Germany. But the Dreadful Few certainly do not want to look at history from that angle precisely because they do not want to take any responsibility whatsoever. 

For them, Nazi Germany was about destroying all Jews in Europe (The Big Lie but America and England bought it). End of story.


To Truly understand the Complete Story No one Dared Mentioned 

for fear of the jew's 

click link below 

The Greatest Story Never Told. 

It is Really Good (a must see)!

The Greatest Story Never Told


Rape and Sex in German Cities After World War II Revisited. (Part II)



…by Jonas E. Alexis


[1] Thomas Goodrich, Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 (Sheridan, CO: Aberdeen Books, 2010), 79.
[2] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 155.
[3] Ibid., 79-80.
[4] Ibid., 156.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid., 158-159.
[7] Ibid., 159.
[8] Ibid., 158.
[9] Ibid., 84.
[10] Ibid., 92.
[11] Ibid., 93.
[12] Ibid., 84.
[13] Ibid., 81.
[14] Ibid., 83.
[15] See for example Giles, After the Reich.
[16] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 158.
[17] Ibid., 147, 148..
[18] Ibid., 148.
[19] See for example Norman A. Naimark, The Russians in Germany: A History of Soviet Zone of Occupation, 1945-1949 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997).
[20] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 83.
[21] Ibid.
[22] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 149.
[23] Ibid.
[24] Ibid.
[25] Ibid., 154.
[26] For other historical accounts on  similar topics, see R. M. Douglas, Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans after the Second World War (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012); Giles MacDonogh, After the Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation (New York: Basic Books, 2007); Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans (New York: Palgrave, 2006); James Bacques, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950(Vancouver: Talonbooks, 2007); Keith Lowe, Inferno: The Fiery Destruction of Hamburg, 1943 (New York: Scribner, 2007).
[27] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 6.
[28] Ibid.
[29] Ibid.
[30] Ibid., 88-89.
[31] Ibid., 91.
[32] Ibid., 96.
[33] Winston Churchill, “Zionism vs. Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People,” Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920.
[34] Quoted in Giles Milton, Russian Roulette: A Deadly Game—How British Spies Thwarted Lenin’s Global Plot (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 2013), 243.
[35] Ibid.
[36] Ibid.
[37] Ralph Raico, Great Wars & Great Leaders (Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2010), 54.
[38] Ibid., 55.
[39] Ibid., 56-57.
[40] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 124-125.
[41] Ibid., 70.
[42] Ibid., 71.
[43] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 96.
[44] See for example Robert S. Stinnett, Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor (New York: The Free Press, 2000).
[45] Ibid., xiii.
[46] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 98.
[47] See Raico, Great Wars and Great Leadres.
[48] Ibid., 99.
[49] John Laurenson, “D-Day Anniversary: France’s Forgotten Blitz,” BBC, June 4, 2014.
[50] Ibid.
[51]Goodrich, Hellstorm, 94.
[52] Daniel Greenfield, “You Can’t Stop Genocide Without Killing Civilians,” FrontPageMag.com, October 13, 2014.
[53] Ibid.
[54] Hitler, Mein Kampf, 43.
[55] Edward J. Bristow, Prostitution and Prejudice: The Jewish Fight Against White Slavery1870-1939 (New York: Schocken Books, 1983), 1.
[56] Hitler, Mein Kampf, 42-43.
[57] Ibid., 43.
[59] Hitler, Mein Kampf, 43.

Bookmark and Share
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=326490